Artemis Security v Exaforce: which AI SOC can a lean team hand more to?
SHORT ANSWER
Artemis Security scores higher overall on our weights, 7.15 to 6.90. Artemis scores higher on Autonomy you can dial, Shows its reasoning and Hosting and data handling; Exaforce scores higher on Pricing clarity; they tie on Investigates end to end, Reaches your data sources and Brings SOAR playbooks along. Every score has a reason in the table below.
By The Alert Desk · AI SOC Compared · Published 2026-09-27 · Updated 2026-10-14
Desk research from public vendor pages; vendor facts read 27 September, 11 October and 13 October 2026; published 27 September 2026, updated 14 October 2026. Editorial assessment; we did not test the products.
Artemis and Exaforce: score per criterion; open Why for both reasons and sources
Criterion
Artemis
Exaforce
Higher
Investigates end to end 20%Why
Artemis: Correlates identity, cloud, endpoint and SaaS data against a living model of the environment and investigates autonomously; its Cursor case cites 96% of investigations resolved autonomously (Artemis's figure).
Exaforce: Exabots handle detection, triage, investigation and response on a unified data layer and knowledge graph, with separate models for data relationships, anomaly detection and reasoning.
Artemis: Acts alone only where you have pre-authorised it, with approval set per action and per connector, impact-checked containment that is reversible by design, and a who, what and why audit trail.
Exaforce: Approval gates, full audit trails and Slack confirmations from users or managers, with actions described as approved and reversible; named autonomy levels per category are not described.
Artemis: Investigations and each proposed action come with evidence and an impact preview; step-level agent reasoning is described less specifically than at the leaders.
Exaforce: Response actions carry full audit trails, but how the reasoning behind a verdict is shown to analysts is not described on the pages reviewed.
Artemis: 225+ connectors, ingesting SIEMs such as Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel and CrowdStrike NG-SIEM and querying stores such as Snowflake, BigQuery and AWS Security Lake in place.
Exaforce: 130+ integrations across IaaS, SaaS, identity, endpoint, SIEM, SOAR, email, ticketing and threat intel; it says it ingests logs, alerts and telemetry from over 100 sources.
Artemis: Ingests hot-path data and queries high-volume data where it lives, and describes on-premises execution of response; tenancy, residency and attestations are not described.
Exaforce: Stores and normalises raw data in its own data layer; tenancy, key control, residency and security attestations are not described on the pages reviewed.
Artemis: An AI-native SOAR builder aimed at teams maintaining a SOAR, with 300+ actions, a Splunk SOAR connector and automatic proposals for playbook updates; playbooks are rebuilt rather than translated.
Exaforce: Out-of-the-box playbooks plus new ones built in natural language, in a visual editor mixing deterministic and agentic steps; existing playbooks are rebuilt rather than translated.
HOSTING SaaS; hot-path data ingested, high-volume data queried where it lives; on-premises execution of response actions described. Tenancy, residency and attestations: Not published.
Exaforce
Not published
No pricing page. AWS Marketplace lists an Agentic SOC Starter Pack at $75,000 per 12-month contract; the unit is not defined.
HOSTING SaaS. Stores and normalises raw data in its own data layer. Tenancy, key control, residency and attestations: Not published on the pages reviewed.
Which should a lean team choose?
Choose Artemis if
it matters most that it autonomy you can dial (9/10)
it matters most that it investigates end to end (8/10)
Choose Artemis Security if you want to decide action by action and connector by connector what may run unattended, or if you maintain a SOAR and want an AI-native builder beside it. Look elsewhere first if you need published pricing or hosting details, or a vendor with a longer track record.
Choose Exaforce if
it matters most that it investigates end to end (8/10)
it matters most that it autonomy you can dial (8/10)
Choose Exaforce if you want native response across cloud, identity and email behind approval gates, or want the option of having Exaforce run the platform for you. Look elsewhere first if you need to see how each verdict was reached, or need published hosting and attestation details.
Frequently asked questions
Which gives a team more control over autonomy, Artemis or Exaforce?
Artemis on our autonomy criterion (Artemis 9/10, Exaforce 8/10). Artemis: Acts alone only where you have pre-authorised it, with approval set per action and per connector, impact-checked containment that is reversible by design, and a who, what and why audit trail. Exaforce: Approval gates, full audit trails and Slack confirmations from users or managers, with actions described as approved and reversible; named autonomy levels per category are not described.
Can Artemis or Exaforce act without a person?
Artemis documents actions on sign-off, and documents unattended actions within limits: Acts alone only where pre-authorised, reversible by design. Exaforce documents actions on sign-off, and Exabots execute response; per-category autonomy settings and a way to pull autonomy back are not described. Rungs documented: Artemis 4.5 of 5, Exaforce 4 of 5.
Which is easier to price, Artemis or Exaforce?
Artemis: Not published. Exaforce: Not published. Pricing clarity scores: Artemis 2/10, Exaforce 4/10.