Prophet Security v Torq AI SOC Platform: which AI SOC can a lean team hand more to?
SHORT ANSWER
Prophet Security scores higher overall on our weights, 7.30 to 7.20. Prophet scores higher on Shows its reasoning, Hosting and data handling and Pricing clarity; Torq scores higher on Reaches your data sources and Brings SOAR playbooks along; they tie on Investigates end to end and Autonomy you can dial. Every score has a reason in the table below.
By The Alert Desk · AI SOC Compared · Published 2026-09-27 · Updated 2026-10-14
Desk research from public vendor pages; vendor facts read 27 September, 11 October and 13 October 2026; published 27 September 2026, updated 14 October 2026. Editorial assessment; we did not test the products.
Torq: Presents oversight and control as core, with governance and audit logs on workflows; a named approval mode is not described on the pages reviewed.
Prophet: Dedicated single-tenant with bring-your-own-key; SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and ISO/IEC 42001:2023; AWS processing in the United States, Germany, Switzerland or Japan; deletion on exit listed, retention period not stated.
Prophet: No price; the pricing address returned not found, a free proof of value is offered, and its AWS Marketplace listing refers buyers to Prophet's site.
A filled rung means the vendor's own pages describe that step. It does not measure how well or how often the step works in your environment.
Documented by Prophet only: show work and act on sign-off. Documented by Torq only: none. Documented by both: triage, investigate and act alone, within limits.
A partial rung counts as not documented in these sentences.
What do they cost, and where do they run?
Prophet
Not published
No price published; the /pricing address returned not found. A free proof of value is offered.
HOSTING Dedicated single-tenant with bring-your-own-key option; infrastructure on AWS with processing in the United States, Germany, Switzerland or Japan; Amazon Bedrock and Anthropic listed as AI subprocessors. On-premises: Not published. SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023.
HOSTING Cloud-native SaaS. Other hosting options: Not published.
Which should a lean team choose?
Choose Prophet if
it matters most that it investigates end to end (8/10)
it matters most that it autonomy you can dial (8/10)
Choose Prophet Security if you want native response with explicit sign-off, single-tenant hosting with your own keys, or a human review service at night. Look elsewhere first if you want existing SOAR playbooks translated or a published price.
Choose Torq if
it matters most that it reaches your data sources (9/10)
it matters most that it investigates end to end (8/10)
Choose Torq if you have many tools to connect and want fixed automations and AI agents in one product, built from plain-language descriptions. Look elsewhere first if you need named approval modes per action or published prices.
Frequently asked questions
Which gives a team more control over autonomy, Prophet or Torq?
Neither: they tie on our autonomy criterion (Prophet 8/10, Torq 8/10). Prophet: Scoped Agent Actions run autonomously or with your sign-off, and Watchtower adds a 24x7 human review service. Torq: Presents oversight and control as core, with governance and audit logs on workflows; a named approval mode is not described on the pages reviewed.
Can Prophet or Torq act without a person?
Prophet documents actions on sign-off, and documents unattended actions within limits: Agent Actions can run autonomously within their scope. Torq does not document actions on sign-off natively, and documents unattended actions within limits: Autonomous remediation through Hyperautomation workflows. Rungs documented: Prophet 5 of 5, Torq 4 of 5.
Which is easier to price, Prophet or Torq?
Prophet: Not published. Torq: Not published. Pricing clarity scores: Prophet 3/10, Torq 2/10.