Skip to content
AI SOC Compared

PAIR PAGE

Exaforce v Mate Security: which AI SOC can a lean team hand more to?

SHORT ANSWER

Mate Security scores higher overall on our weights, 7.90 to 6.90. Exaforce scores higher on Reaches your data sources; Mate scores higher on Investigates end to end, Autonomy you can dial, Shows its reasoning, Hosting and data handling and Brings SOAR playbooks along; they tie on Pricing clarity. Every score has a reason in the table below.

By The Alert Desk · AI SOC Compared · Published 2026-09-27 · Updated 2026-10-14

Desk research from public vendor pages; vendor facts read 27 September, 11 October and 13 October 2026; published 27 September 2026, updated 14 October 2026. Editorial assessment; we did not test the products.

Exaforce

Rank 7 of 10

Exaforce autonomy ladderTRIAGE: Documented; INVESTIGATE: Documented; SHOW WORK: Partial; ACT ON SIGN-OFF: Documented; ACT ALONE, WITHIN LIMITS: PartialTISALExaforce autonomy ladder. TRIAGE: Documented; INVESTIGATE: Documented; SHOW WORK: Partial; ACT ON SIGN-OFF: Documented; ACT ALONE, WITHIN LIMITS: Partial.

Best for: Teams that want native response across cloud, identity and email, run by their own staff or as an Exaforce-managed service

Read the Exaforce profile

Mate Security

Rank 1 of 10

Mate Security autonomy ladderTRIAGE: Documented; INVESTIGATE: Documented; SHOW WORK: Documented; ACT ON SIGN-OFF: Documented; ACT ALONE, WITHIN LIMITS: DocumentedTISALMate Security autonomy ladder. TRIAGE: Documented; INVESTIGATE: Documented; SHOW WORK: Documented; ACT ON SIGN-OFF: Documented; ACT ALONE, WITHIN LIMITS: Documented.

Best for: Lean teams that want every alert investigated with autonomy they can set per category, and SOAR playbooks carried over

Read the Mate profile

Which platform scores higher on each criterion?

Exaforce and Mate: score per criterion; open Why for both reasons and sources
CriterionExaforceMateHigher
Investigates end to end 20%
Why

Exaforce: Exabots handle detection, triage, investigation and response on a unified data layer and knowledge graph, with separate models for data relationships, anomaly detection and reasoning.

Source: Exaforce homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Mate: Mate says it investigates every alert, including informational ones, against a Security Context Graph of memories, decision traces, guardrails and architecture.

Source: Mate Security homepage · Read 11 Oct 2026

8 / 109 / 10Mate
Autonomy you can dial 20%
Why

Exaforce: Approval gates, full audit trails and Slack confirmations from users or managers, with actions described as approved and reversible; named autonomy levels per category are not described.

Source: Exaforce Exabot Respond · Read 13 Oct 2026

Mate: Three levels (Recommend only, Supervised, Auto-run), with each action scored on Confidence, Precision and Reversibility outside the agent loop.

Source: Mate Security platform · Read 11 Oct 2026

8 / 109 / 10Mate
Shows its reasoning 15%
Why

Exaforce: Response actions carry full audit trails, but how the reasoning behind a verdict is shown to analysts is not described on the pages reviewed.

Source: Exaforce Exabot Respond · Read 13 Oct 2026

Mate: Verdicts carry an evidence trail the team can audit and tune, and decision traces record why analysts decided past cases.

Source: Mate Security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

6 / 109 / 10Mate
Reaches your data sources 15%
Why

Exaforce: 130+ integrations across IaaS, SaaS, identity, endpoint, SIEM, SOAR, email, ticketing and threat intel; it says it ingests logs, alerts and telemetry from over 100 sources.

Source: Exaforce integrations · Read 13 Oct 2026

Mate: Names Microsoft, Google Workspace, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Proofpoint and Slack and says it is stack agnostic, but publishes no integration count or catalogue.

Source: Mate Security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

8 / 107 / 10Exaforce
Hosting and data handling 10%
Why

Exaforce: Stores and normalises raw data in its own data layer; tenancy, key control, residency and security attestations are not described on the pages reviewed.

Source: Exaforce homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Mate: Trust center lists ISO 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, CCPA and GDPR, with AWS and Google Cloud as cloud subprocessors; no single-tenant, customer-tenant or residency option is described.

Source: Mate Security trust center · Read 11 Oct 2026

4 / 106 / 10Mate
Brings SOAR playbooks along 10%
Why

Exaforce: Out-of-the-box playbooks plus new ones built in natural language, in a visual editor mixing deterministic and agentic steps; existing playbooks are rebuilt rather than translated.

Source: Exaforce Exabot Respond · Read 13 Oct 2026

Mate: States it translates existing SOAR playbooks into Gamebooks, replacing brittle API calls while keeping custom logic.

Source: Mate Security: Gamebooks · Read 27 Sep 2026

8 / 109 / 10Mate
Pricing clarity 10%
Why

Exaforce: No pricing page; AWS Marketplace lists an Agentic SOC Starter Pack at $75,000 per 12-month contract, without a defined unit.

Source: AWS Marketplace: Exaforce Agentic SOC Starter Pack · Read 13 Oct 2026

Mate: AWS Marketplace listing shows $150,000 for a 12-month contract for one dimension, the Mate Enterprise Tier, a usage tier the listing does not define; no pricing unit and no price on Mate's own site.

Source: AWS Marketplace: Mate Security listing · Read 11 Oct 2026

4 / 104 / 10Tie

How far does each go without a person?

Exaforce

Exaforce autonomy ladderTRIAGE: Documented; INVESTIGATE: Documented; SHOW WORK: Partial; ACT ON SIGN-OFF: Documented; ACT ALONE, WITHIN LIMITS: PartialTRIAGEDOCINVESTIGATEDOCSHOW WORKPARTACT ON SIGN-OFFDOCACT ALONE,WITHIN LIMITSPART
  • Documented on the vendor's pages
  • Partial: in general terms only, or through another product
  • Not documented on the pages reviewed
  1. TRIAGEDocumented

    Exabots triage alerts and escalate only what needs human judgment.

    Source: Exaforce homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

  2. INVESTIGATEDocumented

    Exabots investigate on the unified data layer and knowledge graph.

    Source: Exaforce homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

  3. SHOW WORKPartial

    Actions carry audit trails; verdict reasoning shown to analysts is not described.

    Source: Exaforce Exabot Respond · Read 13 Oct 2026

  4. ACT ON SIGN-OFFDocumented

    Approval gates and Slack confirmations from users or managers.

    Source: Exaforce Exabot Respond · Read 13 Oct 2026

  5. ACT ALONE, WITHIN LIMITSPartial

    Exabots execute response; per-category autonomy settings and a way to pull autonomy back are not described.

    Source: Exaforce Exabot Respond · Read 13 Oct 2026

A filled rung means the vendor's own pages describe that step. It does not measure how well or how often the step works in your environment.

Mate

Mate Security autonomy ladderTRIAGE: Documented; INVESTIGATE: Documented; SHOW WORK: Documented; ACT ON SIGN-OFF: Documented; ACT ALONE, WITHIN LIMITS: DocumentedTRIAGEDOCINVESTIGATEDOCSHOW WORKDOCACT ON SIGN-OFFDOCACT ALONE,WITHIN LIMITSDOC
  • Documented on the vendor's pages
  • Partial: in general terms only, or through another product
  • Not documented on the pages reviewed
  1. TRIAGEDocumented

    Mate says it investigates 100% of alerts, including informational ones.

    Source: Mate Security homepage · Read 11 Oct 2026

  2. INVESTIGATEDocumented

    Investigations run against the Security Context Graph with domain logic for six alert domains.

    Source: Mate Security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

  3. SHOW WORKDocumented

    Verdicts come with an evidence trail; decision traces record why analysts decided past cases.

    Source: Mate Security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

  4. ACT ON SIGN-OFFDocumented

    Supervised level: human in the loop for response.

    Source: Mate Security platform · Read 11 Oct 2026

  5. ACT ALONE, WITHIN LIMITSDocumented

    Auto-run level with CPR checks outside the agent loop; falls back to Supervised on conflict with analysts.

    Source: Mate Security platform · Read 11 Oct 2026

A filled rung means the vendor's own pages describe that step. It does not measure how well or how often the step works in your environment.

Documented by Exaforce only: none. Documented by Mate only: show work and act alone, within limits. Documented by both: triage, investigate and act on sign-off.

A partial rung counts as not documented in these sentences.

What do they cost, and where do they run?

Exaforce

Not published

No pricing page. AWS Marketplace lists an Agentic SOC Starter Pack at $75,000 per 12-month contract; the unit is not defined.

Source: AWS Marketplace: Exaforce Agentic SOC Starter Pack · Read 13 Oct 2026

HOSTING SaaS. Stores and normalises raw data in its own data layer. Tenancy, key control, residency and attestations: Not published on the pages reviewed.

Mate

Not published

No price on Mate's own site. AWS Marketplace listing: $150,000 for a 12-month contract, dimension Mate Enterprise Tier (described as the usage tier level in the Mate platform, not otherwise defined); private offers through Mate's sales team. Mate says marketplace purchases can count toward AWS commitments.

Source: AWS Marketplace: Mate Security listing · Read 11 Oct 2026

HOSTING SaaS. Mate's AWS Marketplace post says it is built on AWS infrastructure; its trust center lists Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud as cloud subprocessors. Self-hosted, customer-tenant and data residency options: Not published.

Which should a lean team choose?

Choose Exaforce if

  • it matters most that it investigates end to end (8/10)
  • it matters most that it autonomy you can dial (8/10)

Choose Exaforce if you want native response across cloud, identity and email behind approval gates, or want the option of having Exaforce run the platform for you. Look elsewhere first if you need to see how each verdict was reached, or need published hosting and attestation details.

Choose Mate if

  • it matters most that it investigates end to end (9/10)
  • it matters most that it autonomy you can dial (9/10)

Choose Mate Security if you want every alert investigated and a documented way to move categories from recommendations to unattended action and back, or if you have SOAR playbooks you want carried over rather than rebuilt. Look elsewhere first if you need a defined pricing unit, a published integration catalogue or hosting in your own tenant.

Where Mate Security scores lower

Mate Security ranks 1 of 10 on default weights. It holds the highest or tied highest score on Investigates end to end, Autonomy you can dial, Shows its reasoning and Brings SOAR playbooks along. It scores lower on Reaches your data sources (7 against Torq AI SOC Platform at 9), Hosting and data handling (6 against Conifers CognitiveSOC at 9) and Pricing clarity (4 against Dropzone AI and Intezer at 5).

Mate publishes no pricing unit (its only public price is an AWS Marketplace listing for one undefined usage tier), no integration count, and no single-tenant, customer-tenant or residency option. Its lead comes from autonomy control and playbooks: it is the only platform here that describes three autonomy levels with action checks outside the agent loop and translating existing SOAR playbooks.

Frequently asked questions

Which gives a team more control over autonomy, Exaforce or Mate?

Mate on our autonomy criterion (Exaforce 8/10, Mate 9/10). Exaforce: Approval gates, full audit trails and Slack confirmations from users or managers, with actions described as approved and reversible; named autonomy levels per category are not described. Mate: Three levels (Recommend only, Supervised, Auto-run), with each action scored on Confidence, Precision and Reversibility outside the agent loop.

Can Exaforce or Mate act without a person?

Exaforce documents actions on sign-off, and Exabots execute response; per-category autonomy settings and a way to pull autonomy back are not described. Mate documents actions on sign-off, and documents unattended actions within limits: Auto-run level with CPR checks outside the agent loop; falls back to Supervised on conflict with analysts. Rungs documented: Exaforce 4 of 5, Mate 5 of 5.

Which is easier to price, Exaforce or Mate?

Exaforce: Not published. Mate: Not published. Pricing clarity scores: Exaforce 4/10, Mate 4/10.