Mate Security v Prophet Security: which AI SOC can a lean team hand more to?
SHORT ANSWER
Mate Security scores higher overall on our weights, 7.90 to 7.30. Mate scores higher on Investigates end to end, Autonomy you can dial, Shows its reasoning, Brings SOAR playbooks along and Pricing clarity; Prophet scores higher on Reaches your data sources and Hosting and data handling. Every score has a reason in the table below.
By The Alert Desk · AI SOC Compared · Published 2026-09-27 · Updated 2026-10-14
Desk research from public vendor pages; vendor facts read 27 September, 11 October and 13 October 2026; published 27 September 2026, updated 14 October 2026. Editorial assessment; we did not test the products.
Mate and Prophet: score per criterion; open Why for both reasons and sources
Criterion
Mate
Prophet
Higher
Investigates end to end 20%Why
Mate: Mate says it investigates every alert, including informational ones, against a Security Context Graph of memories, decision traces, guardrails and architecture.
Mate: Names Microsoft, Google Workspace, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Proofpoint and Slack and says it is stack agnostic, but publishes no integration count or catalogue.
Mate: Trust center lists ISO 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, CCPA and GDPR, with AWS and Google Cloud as cloud subprocessors; no single-tenant, customer-tenant or residency option is described.
Prophet: Dedicated single-tenant with bring-your-own-key; SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and ISO/IEC 42001:2023; AWS processing in the United States, Germany, Switzerland or Japan; deletion on exit listed, retention period not stated.
Mate: AWS Marketplace listing shows $150,000 for a 12-month contract for one dimension, the Mate Enterprise Tier, a usage tier the listing does not define; no pricing unit and no price on Mate's own site.
Prophet: No price; the pricing address returned not found, a free proof of value is offered, and its AWS Marketplace listing refers buyers to Prophet's site.
A filled rung means the vendor's own pages describe that step. It does not measure how well or how often the step works in your environment.
Documented by Mate only: none. Documented by Prophet only: none. Documented by both: triage, investigate, show work, act on sign-off and act alone, within limits.
A partial rung counts as not documented in these sentences.
What do they cost, and where do they run?
Mate
Not published
No price on Mate's own site. AWS Marketplace listing: $150,000 for a 12-month contract, dimension Mate Enterprise Tier (described as the usage tier level in the Mate platform, not otherwise defined); private offers through Mate's sales team. Mate says marketplace purchases can count toward AWS commitments.
HOSTING SaaS. Mate's AWS Marketplace post says it is built on AWS infrastructure; its trust center lists Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud as cloud subprocessors. Self-hosted, customer-tenant and data residency options: Not published.
Prophet
Not published
No price published; the /pricing address returned not found. A free proof of value is offered.
HOSTING Dedicated single-tenant with bring-your-own-key option; infrastructure on AWS with processing in the United States, Germany, Switzerland or Japan; Amazon Bedrock and Anthropic listed as AI subprocessors. On-premises: Not published. SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023.
Which should a lean team choose?
Choose Mate if
it matters most that it investigates end to end (9/10)
it matters most that it autonomy you can dial (9/10)
Choose Mate Security if you want every alert investigated and a documented way to move categories from recommendations to unattended action and back, or if you have SOAR playbooks you want carried over rather than rebuilt. Look elsewhere first if you need a defined pricing unit, a published integration catalogue or hosting in your own tenant.
Choose Prophet if
it matters most that it investigates end to end (8/10)
it matters most that it autonomy you can dial (8/10)
Choose Prophet Security if you want native response with explicit sign-off, single-tenant hosting with your own keys, or a human review service at night. Look elsewhere first if you want existing SOAR playbooks translated or a published price.
Where Mate Security scores lower
Mate Security ranks 1 of 10 on default weights. It holds the highest or tied highest score on Investigates end to end, Autonomy you can dial, Shows its reasoning and Brings SOAR playbooks along. It scores lower on Reaches your data sources (7 against Torq AI SOC Platform at 9), Hosting and data handling (6 against Conifers CognitiveSOC at 9) and Pricing clarity (4 against Dropzone AI and Intezer at 5).
Mate publishes no pricing unit (its only public price is an AWS Marketplace listing for one undefined usage tier), no integration count, and no single-tenant, customer-tenant or residency option. Its lead comes from autonomy control and playbooks: it is the only platform here that describes three autonomy levels with action checks outside the agent loop and translating existing SOAR playbooks.
Which gives a team more control over autonomy, Mate or Prophet?
Mate on our autonomy criterion (Mate 9/10, Prophet 8/10). Mate: Three levels (Recommend only, Supervised, Auto-run), with each action scored on Confidence, Precision and Reversibility outside the agent loop. Prophet: Scoped Agent Actions run autonomously or with your sign-off, and Watchtower adds a 24x7 human review service.
Can Mate or Prophet act without a person?
Mate documents actions on sign-off, and documents unattended actions within limits: Auto-run level with CPR checks outside the agent loop; falls back to Supervised on conflict with analysts. Prophet documents actions on sign-off, and documents unattended actions within limits: Agent Actions can run autonomously within their scope. Rungs documented: Mate 5 of 5, Prophet 5 of 5.
Which is easier to price, Mate or Prophet?
Mate: Not published. Prophet: Not published. Pricing clarity scores: Mate 4/10, Prophet 3/10.